Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads with 28.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $1.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
10 months newer

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Claude 3 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra