Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 leads with 17.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3. Both models have similar pricing. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 was introduced as a major architectural advancement, developed with 671B mixture-of-experts parameters and trained on 14.8 trillion tokens. Built to be three times faster than V2 while maintaining open-source availability, it demonstrates competitive performance against frontier closed-source models and represents a significant leap in efficient large-scale model design.
9 months newer

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13

DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3

Claude 3 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3

DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek