+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek-V3 0324
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 0324 leads with 35.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 72.3K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3 0324. Both models have similar pricing. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 0324 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3-0324 represents a specific release iteration of DeepSeek-V3, developed to incorporate ongoing improvements and refinements. Built to provide enhanced stability and performance based on deployment learnings, it continues the evolution of the DeepSeek-V3 architecture with iterative enhancements.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
DeepSeek-V3 0324
DeepSeek
2025-03-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input:$0.28
Output:$1.14($0.08 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:33.3%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Average Score:68.4%(+35.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:33.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Avg Score:68.4%(+35.1%)
Providers:1