+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 46.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 170.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is $0.82 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input:$0.27
Output:$0.41($0.82 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:33.3%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:79.9%(+46.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:33.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:79.9%(+46.6%)
Providers:2