+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 18.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $1.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
12 months newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($1.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:62.1%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:80.5%(+18.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:62.1%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:80.5%(+18.4%)
Providers:2