Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Haiku leads with 6.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 379.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. Both models have similar pricing. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
11 months newer

GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Haiku

GPT-3.5 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku

GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Haiku

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Claude 3 Haiku

GPT-3.5 Turbo

GPT-3.5 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI