Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 nano leads with 11.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 680.3K more tokens in context window than Claude 3 Haiku. GPT-4.1 nano is $1.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
1 year newer

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13

GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Haiku

GPT-4.1 nano
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku

GPT-4.1 nano
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Haiku

GPT-4.1 nano

Claude 3 Haiku

GPT-4.1 nano

GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI