+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 23.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 255.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Claude 3 Haiku is $11.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
4 months newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25($11.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:54.3%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:77.9%(+23.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:54.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:77.9%(+23.6%)
Providers:2