+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-5 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 mini leads with 49.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 mini offers 128.0K more tokens in context window than Claude 3 Haiku. Claude 3 Haiku is $0.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-5 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Mini was created as a more accessible version of GPT-5, designed to provide strong capabilities with improved efficiency and lower operational costs. Built to extend GPT-5's advancements to a broader range of applications, it balances advanced performance with practical deployment considerations.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
GPT-5 mini
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25($0.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Input:$0.25
Output:$2.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:33.3%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Average Score:82.3%(+49.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 mini
2024-05-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:33.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Avg Score:82.3%(+49.0%)
Providers:2