Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 31.6% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 124.3K more tokens in context window than Claude 3 Haiku. Claude 3 Haiku is $1.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
1 year newer

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13

Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Haiku

Kimi K2 0905
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku

Kimi K2 0905
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Haiku

Kimi K2 0905

Claude 3 Haiku

Kimi K2 0905

Kimi K2 0905
Novita
ZeroEval