Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 5.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $1.10 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
4 months newer

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Haiku

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Haiku

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Claude 3 Haiku

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together