+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Haiku leads with 3.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
6 months newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:84.8%(+3.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:81.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:84.8%(+3.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:81.6%
Providers:0