Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 16.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $0.75 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
6 months newer

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Haiku

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Haiku

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Claude 3 Haiku

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together