+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct leads with 15.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:49.1%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:64.7%(+15.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:49.1%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:64.7%(+15.6%)
Providers:0