+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs Nova Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Lite leads with 9.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 98.0K more tokens in context window than Nova Lite. Nova Lite is $1.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Nova Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Lite was developed as a lightweight multimodal model, designed to provide efficient AI capabilities for text and image understanding. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications with quick response times, it represents Amazon's entry-level offering in the Nova family.
8 months newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Nova Lite
Amazon
2024-11-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Input:$0.06
Output:$0.24($1.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:68.5%
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Average Score:78.3%(+9.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:68.5%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Avg Score:78.3%(+9.8%)
Providers:1