+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs o1-preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-preview leads with 29.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 239.2K more tokens in context window than o1-preview. Claude 3 Haiku is $73.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1-preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-preview was introduced as an early version of OpenAI's reasoning model series, designed to demonstrate the potential of AI models that engage in extended thinking before responding. Built to solve complex problems through deliberate reasoning processes, it represented an initial step toward more thoughtful and analytical AI systems.
6 months newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
o1-preview
OpenAI
2024-09-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25($73.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:55.6%
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Average Score:85.1%(+29.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:55.6%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Avg Score:85.1%(+29.5%)
Providers:2