+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen2 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2 72B Instruct leads with 4.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B was developed as the flagship model in the Qwen2 generation, designed to provide advanced language understanding with 72 billion parameters. Built to deliver strong performance across diverse tasks, it represented a significant advancement in Qwen's model capabilities when introduced.
4 months newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-07-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:69.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Average Score:74.0%(+4.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:69.6%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Avg Score:74.0%(+4.4%)
Providers:0