+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $1.10 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($1.10 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:3