Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 43.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 268.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Both models have similar pricing. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 year newer

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Haiku

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Haiku

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Claude 3 Haiku

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita