+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 9.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Opus is available on 3 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.4%), HellaSwag (95.4%), GSM8k (95.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:42.8%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:52.7%(+9.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:42.8%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:52.7%(+9.9%)
Providers:0