Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Opus leads with 29.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 120B. GPT OSS 120B is $89.46 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, Claude 3 Opus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.4%), HellaSwag (95.4%), GSM8k (95.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3 Opus
GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
Claude 3 Opus
GPT OSS 120B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3 Opus
GPT OSS 120B
Claude 3 Opus
GPT OSS 120B
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval