+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Opus leads with 11.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Opus is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3 Opus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.4%), HellaSwag (95.4%), GSM8k (95.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is a language model developed by IBM. The model shows competitive results across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AttaQ (86.1%), HumanEval (82.4%), HumanEval+ (78.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:49.9%(+11.8%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:38.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:49.9%(+11.8%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:38.1%
Providers:0