+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs Grok-1.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Opus leads with 21.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3 Opus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.4%), HellaSwag (95.4%), GSM8k (95.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-1.5V is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (88.3%), DocVQA (85.6%), TextVQA (78.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Grok-1.5V
xAI
2024-04-12
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:49.9%(+21.9%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Average Score:28.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:49.9%(+21.9%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Avg Score:28.0%
Providers:0