+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Opus leads with 61.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3 Opus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.4%), HellaSwag (95.4%), GSM8k (95.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 82.5% across 2 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2024 (86.0%), GPQA (79.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:74.8%(+61.1%)
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:13.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:74.8%(+61.1%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:13.7%
Providers:0