+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs Codestral-22B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Opus leads with 3.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Opus is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral 22B was developed as a specialized coding model from Mistral AI, designed to excel at code generation, completion, and understanding tasks. Built with 22 billion parameters optimized for programming, it serves developers requiring advanced assistance with software development across multiple programming languages.
3 months newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:84.9%(+3.8%)
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:81.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:84.9%(+3.8%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:81.1%
Providers:0