+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs Command R+
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Opus leads with 16.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Command R+ is $88.75 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3 Opus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
6 months newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($88.75 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:93.4%(+16.9%)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:76.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:93.4%(+16.9%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:76.5%
Providers:2