+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek-V2.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V2.5 leads with 3.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus offers 383.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $89.58 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
2 months newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input:$0.14
Output:$0.28($89.58 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:81.7%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Average Score:84.8%(+3.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:81.7%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Avg Score:84.8%(+3.1%)
Providers:3