+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek-V3.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 19.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus offers 72.3K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.1. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $88.73 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
10 months newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00($88.73 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:59.5%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:79.3%(+19.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:59.5%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:79.3%(+19.8%)
Providers:2