+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 4.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $89.70 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($89.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:74.3%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:78.4%(+4.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:74.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:78.4%(+4.1%)
Providers:2