+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Opus leads with 15.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $89.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3 Opus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
4 months newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($89.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:91.1%(+15.4%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:75.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:91.1%(+15.4%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:75.8%
Providers:2