+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-mini leads with 5.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus offers 206.5K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. o1-mini is $75.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
6 months newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00($75.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:74.0%
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:79.2%(+5.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:74.0%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:79.2%(+5.2%)
Providers:2