+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs o1-preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-preview leads with 13.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus offers 239.2K more tokens in context window than o1-preview. o1-preview is $15.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1-preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-preview was introduced as an early version of OpenAI's reasoning model series, designed to demonstrate the potential of AI models that engage in extended thinking before responding. Built to solve complex problems through deliberate reasoning processes, it represented an initial step toward more thoughtful and analytical AI systems.
6 months newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
o1-preview
OpenAI
2024-09-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00($15.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:72.0%
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Average Score:85.1%(+13.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:72.0%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Avg Score:85.1%(+13.1%)
Providers:2