+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Opus leads with 3.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Opus is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
6 months newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:77.4%(+3.9%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:73.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:77.4%(+3.9%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:73.5%
Providers:0