Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Opus leads with 9.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $89.82 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3 Opus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
6 months newer

Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Opus

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Opus

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Opus

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Claude 3 Opus

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Lambda