+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads with 3.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Average Score:70.1%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:73.4%(+3.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Opus
Avg Score:70.1%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:73.4%(+3.2%)
Providers:0