Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 20.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Opus offers 268.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $88.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Opus is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus was developed as the most capable model in the Claude 3 family, designed to set new industry benchmarks across a wide range of cognitive tasks. Built to handle complex analysis and extended tasks requiring deep reasoning, it balanced frontier intelligence with careful safety considerations, representing the flagship tier of the Claude 3 generation.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 year newer

Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2024-02-29

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Opus

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Opus

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Opus

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Claude 3 Opus

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita