Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 27.7% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.8% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (93.2%), GSM8k (92.3%), HellaSwag (89.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
Claude 3 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock