Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 2.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $15.20 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.8% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (93.2%), GSM8k (92.3%), HellaSwag (89.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
Claude 3 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Claude 3 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval