+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 14.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.8% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (93.2%), GSM8k (92.3%), HellaSwag (89.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:38.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:52.7%(+14.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:38.7%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:52.7%(+14.0%)
Providers:0