Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 43.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 136.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
1 year newer

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Sonnet

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Sonnet

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Sonnet

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude 3 Sonnet

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval