+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs DeepSeek-R1-0528
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 34.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $15.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input:$0.50
Output:$2.15($15.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:48.6%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:83.0%(+34.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:48.6%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:83.0%(+34.4%)
Providers:3