+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs DeepSeek-V2.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V2.5 leads with 13.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 383.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $17.58 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V2.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
2 months newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input:$0.14
Output:$0.28($17.58 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:71.9%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Average Score:84.8%(+13.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:71.9%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Avg Score:84.8%(+13.0%)
Providers:3