+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs DeepSeek-V3.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 30.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 72.3K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.1. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $16.73 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
10 months newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00($16.73 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:48.6%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:79.3%(+30.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:48.6%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:79.3%(+30.7%)
Providers:2