Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 42.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $15.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
1 year newer

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Claude 3 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval