+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 13.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($17.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:64.8%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:78.4%(+13.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:64.8%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:78.4%(+13.6%)
Providers:2