+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs GLM-4.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Sonnet offers 203.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5V. GLM-4.5V is $15.20 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20($15.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2