+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 18.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 255.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. GPT-4o is $5.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
5 months newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00($5.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:58.7%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:76.8%(+18.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:58.7%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:76.8%(+18.1%)
Providers:2