+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs GPT-5 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 mini leads with 41.9% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 mini offers 128.0K more tokens in context window than Claude 3 Sonnet. GPT-5 mini is $15.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-5 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Mini was created as a more accessible version of GPT-5, designed to provide strong capabilities with improved efficiency and lower operational costs. Built to extend GPT-5's advancements to a broader range of applications, it balances advanced performance with practical deployment considerations.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
GPT-5 mini
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Input:$0.25
Output:$2.00($15.75 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:40.4%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Average Score:82.3%(+41.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 mini
2024-05-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:40.4%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Avg Score:82.3%(+41.9%)
Providers:2