+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 18.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 264.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Grok-2 is $6.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
5 months newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00($6.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:58.5%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:76.7%(+18.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:58.5%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:76.7%(+18.2%)
Providers:1