+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 28.0% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 124.3K more tokens in context window than Claude 3 Sonnet. Kimi K2 0905 is $14.90 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50($14.90 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:58.5%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:86.4%(+28.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:58.5%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:86.4%(+28.0%)
Providers:2